MIL-PRF-49078A(CR)
4. VERIFICATION
4.1 Verification methods. Verification of all paragraph 3 requirements shall be in accordance
with a contractor submitted, government approved Inspection Plan to be submitted along with
proposal.
4.1.1 Verification alternatives. The contractor may propose alternative test methods, techniques,
or equipment, including the application of statistical process control, tool control, or cost-
effective sampling procedures, to verify performance as long as they are equivalent to the
verification procedures in this specification.
5. PACKAGING
5.1 For acquisition purposes, the contract or order shall specify packaging requirements (see
6.2). When DOD personnel perform material packaging, those personnel need to contact the
responsible packaging activity to ascertain requisite packaging requirements. The Inventory
Control Point packaging activity within the Military Department of Defense Agency, or within the
Military Department's System Command, maintains packaging requirements. Packaging data
retrieval is available from the managing Military Department's or Defense Agency's automated
packaging files, CD-ROM products, or by contacting the responsible packaging activity.
6. NOTES
(This section contains general or explanatory information that may be helpful, but is not
mandatory)
6.1 Intended use. Handset H-250( )/U is used with military man-pack radio equipment such as
the AN/PRC-70 and AN/PRC-77. Handset H-250( )/U can substitute for Handset H-189/GR.
The H-250( )/U handset assembly is a disposable item.
6.2
Ordering data. Procurement documents should specify the following:
a. Title, number and date of this specification and any amendment.
b. Issue of the DODISS to be cited in the solicitation, and if required, the specific issue of
individual documents referenced (see 2.2).
c. The government approved inspection plan per paragraph 4.1
d. What conformance verification is necessary (see 6.3).
e. Packaging requirements (see 5.1).
f. The parentheses in the nomenclature will be deleted or replaced by a letter identifying
the particular design; for example: H-250W/U. The contractor should apply for
nomenclature according to the applicable contract clause.
6.3 Conformance inspection. Affordable conformance inspection with confidence varies
depending upon a number of procurement risk factors. Some of these factors include: Contractor
past performance, government schedules and budget, product material and design maturity,
manufacturing capital equipment and processes applied, the controlled uniformity of those
7
For Parts Inquires call Parts Hangar, Inc (727) 493-0744
© Copyright 2015 Integrated Publishing, Inc.
A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business